Genmab

	3/7 11:12 af GeorgeBest	OK, kkjoel - jeg stopper med at linke fra nu af...
	3/7 11:07 af lahn1	:D kkjoel
	3/7 11:07 af kkjoel	Hrrrrrmffff :-(
	3/7 11:06 af kkjoel	Enig. Det samme er jo tilfældet med de der åndssvage sider, hvor det er åbenlyst at en algoritme sætter både kursmål og anbefaling. Det fatter jeg ikke nogen ulejliger os med at linke til!
	3/7 10:59 af Solsen	Banditter i habitter - tænk ikke over hvad de laver. Vi kan ikke bruge anbefalinger om det ene eller andet til noget !
	3/7 10:42 af kkjoel	Dog tager han selvfølgelig helt fejl med omsætningens størrelse i 2030! MJ, hvor stor er den da? (hold dig endelig ikke tilbage;-)
	3/7 10:39 af kkjoel	Han forudskikker trods alt, at omsætningen vil 6-dobles frem til 2030.. så helt pessimist er han jo ikke: 5 mia (2019) * 6 = 30 mia.
	3/7 10:38 af bibob	:-)
	3/7 10:34 af E L	IF it is on their own books , then you would think they are buying it on behalf of somebody else. European banks don't take positions of this size any more. In which case we can start a nice take over rumour
	3/7 10:34 af Doublo	Man kan roligt sige, at "afsløringen" som storaktionærer er det bedst tænkelige dementi for deres grove manipulationer med kursanbefaling. Det er muligt, at de n u sælger for at komme under de famøse 5%, eller de har prøvet at skræmme folk til at sælge, så de selv kan komme til fadet med billige aktier, spændende at observerer i dagens løb og de næste dage.
	3/7 10:33 af kkjoel	Skidt at de mener risikoen ved GENs pipeline er undervurderet.
	3/7 10:31 af kkjoel	Fint med ny storaktionær.
	3/7 10:31 af kkjoel	Meget, meget underligt. Det giver slet ingen mening. medmindre, som EL siger, de har tænkt sig at købe endnu flere.
	3/7 10:31 af E L	it would be interesting to know where the shares are , owned by SocGen or by some of their public funds
	3/7 10:29 af E L	it would probably also be illegal imo. Even in french law ;-)
	3/7 10:28 af E L	IF it is coordinated (which we don't know) , the only rational would be if they need to buy more...
	3/7 10:28 af Bulder	then
	3/7 10:27 af Bulder	Yes but completely irrational. First you buy and recommend sell??
	3/7 10:26 af E L	and it would a big f*** you from the Asset manager to the analyst lol
	3/7 10:25 af E L	@bulder that is the question. IF they have propper Chines walls then you are correct. But the coincidence is stunning to say the least ....
	3/7 10:24 af E L	maybe by accident, we have seen that before, eg with Blackrock, they sell a few shares the day after to get under 5% again
	3/7 10:24 af Bulder	I think that the analyst is not aware of what is going on in the trade department.
	3/7 10:24 af E L	they have not bought the whole position at 2169, they could have had 4.99% for months and just crossed the 5% now
	3/7 10:22 af bibob	Yes , Why buy in 2169 and then downgrade to 1600. It dont' make sense . ?? Newcoming major shareholder and then downgrade !! I dont get it too.

	3/7 10:20 af royal	Stocks
	3/7 10:20 af Bulder	But they bought the 29.of June. Price then was 2169. Not rational.
	3/7 10:20 af royal	They have seen the Light and want more storks cheap.
	3/7 10:19 af Doublo	Ja den er da til at føle på!! de burde straffes for vildledende anbefalinger.
	3/7 10:15 af E L	I am really curious what is behind this SocGen story now lol, it is just very hard to believe this is pure coincidence
	3/7 10:13 af E L	@Bulder I would be very happy with both ;-)
	3/7 10:02 af SEACOP	SocGen: Salgsanbefaling i går, og i dag storaktionær... hihi
	3/7 10:01 af Bulder	E L but between us I'll be looking forward to $94 in 5 years. It beats my 5555.
	3/7 09:54 af exitnu	... klarer ..
	3/7 09:54 af Budweis	Sælg jeres aktier!! - så vi kan købe billigt :-)
	3/7 09:54 af exitnu	Genmab klar sig da fint idag.
	3/7 09:54 af GeorgeBest	(link)
	3/7 09:54 af GeorgeBest	Societe General is new major shareholder!
	3/7 09:46 af nohope	Damn - now I´ve already spent the money corresponding to a price of 45.101 USD
	3/7 09:44 af Bulder	Ok, I didn't see your link. Now I've seen the page, and you are right.
	3/7 09:41 af E L	come on Bulder, it is complete bullsh** page, computer generated, 'forecasting' an Opening ,Closing ,Minimum and Maximum price 5 years out , $1 wide lol
	3/7 09:36 af Bulder	45.10 is just under 3000. Optimistic? Yes but possible.
	3/7 09:30 af Bulder	What's so funny? Yesterday it was 33.44. Remember US use dots where we use commas.
	3/7 09:15 af Vitus	:-)
	3/7 09:14 af E L	You just have to find the right pages on the web to confirm your bias lol. Imagine, people actually pay for a subscription to sites like that
	3/7 09:12 af E L	"Will Genmab A/S stock price grow / rise / go up? Yes. The GMAB stock price can go up from 33.390 USD to 45.101 USD in one year." :-D :-D :-D (link)
	3/7 09:07 af gentogen	De skulle hellere interessere sig for chatindlæg fra klokken 20 i aftes....
	3/7 09:04 af Vitus	Den falder trods alt ikke alle 600 kurspoint på en gang :-)
	3/7 08:56 af exitnu	"Kun 4 af 27 analytikere" Pæn overvægt for køb ...
	3/7 08:55 af exitnu	"Kursmålet er samtidig fastsat til 1620 kr. Dermed venter finanshuset, at aktien vil falde omkring 27 pct. fra det nuværende kursniveau, skriver Bloomberg News. Kun 4 af 27 analytikere, der leverer analyser til Bloomberg, anbefaler sælg, mens 14 anbefaler køb."
	3/7 08:28 af bibob	Børsen.: Genmab kan rammes af " sælg " anbefaling i roligt marked.